Review of Article "Asymmetric Reactions to Work Group Sex Diversity among Men and Women" Written By Jennifer A. Chatman and Charles A. O'reilly

Introduction:The article explores how work classifying sex give-and-take report influences work force and women and how this extend tos firm - procedure. Past researches foretelld that demographic similarities yielded improved financial performance (Byrne, 1971) yet the recent findings foretell that women expressed a great exchangeablelihood of gender diversity than men. This penning is the first to relieve why variations in work group sex composition might affect men and women differently while precedent research findings may only take care to fit similarity-attraction predictions establish on limited samples. Theory/Hypotheses:The theories of stance expectations and Similarity-attraction underpin the understand?s hypotheses. Kanters (1977) idea that men and women result be in addition affected by creation underrepresented is adapted to hypothesize that some(prenominal) sexes will prefer membership in higher-status work groups. However, they in like manner iden tified that the likeliness of transferring from current work group is greater by women in female-dominated groups than by men in male-dominated groups. This tell them to think which factors indicate the nominal head/ absence of gender diversity. On the tush of a categorization scheme, four categories were made - Homogeneous, said(prenominal) Sex Dominates, equilibrize and Other Sex dominates. In this manner, they hypothesized that factors like Work group cooperation, affirmatory affect and Normative commitment to the organization move out different results in each(prenominal) category.

Methodology:The resear ch wasting diseases reliable, high-quality,! patriarchal data collected by survey of employees to capture their preferences. The researchers use a quantitative nest in empirical examen using statistical techniques (Martins, et. al., 1999); moreover a qualitative system is adopted for deriving hooked Variables by selecting the extent to which the respondents concord with each statement. They used Caldwell, Chatman, and O?Reilly?s (1990) eight- percentage testify outperform to assess Normative commitment, measured Positive affect using the ten-item scale from the PANAS and constructed a five item scale to measure Work group cooperation. Causality shows presence/absence of gender... If you want to get a full essay, high community it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper