Consider William Blakes presentation of love in the poem The Clod and the Pebble Essay

(b) Paying close attention to manner of speaking and form, write a critical esteem of the following poem, considering William Blakes presentation of cognise in the poem The ballock and the Pebble.The Clod and the PebbleLove seeketh not itself to pl quilt,Nor for itself hath any care, scarce for different gives its ease,And builds a Heaven in cuckoos nests despair.So birdsong a little Clod of form 5Trodden with the cowss feet, simply a Pebble of the brookWarbled out these metres actionLove seeketh simply self to please,To stay put another to its delight, 10Joys in anothers loss of ease,And builds a Hell in Heavens despite.The superficial cuteness of the poem The Clod and the Pebble mayhap masks a more morbid and profoundly cynical judgment of respect by the poet William Blake. Initially, the contrast between the hoodlum and the pebbles manner of speakinges on hunch over might hike up a positive response to the goons optimism close to how do loafer rescue us fro m even the just round hellish position. The pebbles pessimism around love, on the other hand, is unpleasant and unsettling, but its to a fault a more absolute reflection of the barbarian nature of the being as it is depicted in the poem. Blakes presentation of love, then, is ambivalent. While the ideal that love is able to overcome any linguistic place setting of use is appealing, it might not be a realistic estimation in the context of the worlds cruelty.Blakes embodiment of the nut and the pebble captures two very unlike human experiences. We are told that the swelling is trodden with the cattles feet. With the word trodden Blake captures the experience of recurrent hardship, and being repeatedly downtrodden, subjugated and abused. in that location is also tactile imagery of tip and pressure from the cattles feet, constraining the egg and forcing it into a new shape. In this way, the clod is described as though it experiences human suffering. It makes us think ab out someone who has had to become flexible to twin the continual hardship of their circumstances reflected in the physical properties of a cushy clod of clay. It is then pleasantly surprising that the clod sings about love in the about optimistic way.On the one hand, the clods optimism concerning love is deeply admirable, and the analog structure used to present this speech alongside the pebbles emphasises that optimism in the approximately appealing way. The clod states that love builds a Heaven in Hells despair, patch the pebble states that it builds a Hell in Heavens despite. The clod speaks from the context of a hellish worldly concern that entails pain and suffering, and endows love with the capacity to transcend much(prenominal) an experience and cause a ethitheral existence of joy and happiness. The pebble, on the other hand, speaks from a comparatively heavenly existence and instead endows love with the capacity to putrefy that existence with the pain and sufferin g suggested by the word Hell. Our heart that the clod is laudably optimistic ten evolves into a feeling that we too want and even deal that love will rescue and result solace to this figure.Conversely, the parallel structure also protagonists to emphasise the pebbles pessimism. The clod declares that love seeketh not itself, while the pebble answers that love seeketh only self. The phrases not itself and only self create a clear juxtaposition here of the two views of love. The first underscores it as basically selfless, while the other underscores it as dead and solely selfish. Moreover, while the clod sings gayly about how love for another gives its ease the pebble responds with how love joys in anothers loss of ease. The clods actors line suggest an action of willing self-sacrifice, while the pebbles words suggest a selfish acquisition that leaves another diminished. Of course, the pebbles view means that there is no hope for the clod and that love in fact provides no Heav en.Furthemore, the pebbles assessment of love is deeply cynical and ugly. It is, however, authorized to both its own experience and that of the clod. The clod is trodden upon while the pebble is of the brook. We imagine a harming and tranquil existence within the soft current of a stream. Traditionally, however, rivers also epitomise a journey from innocence to worldliness. The water system represents the experience that flows over us during life, difference us more aware. This experience has leave the pebble implacable. We imagine someone who has become inured from experience and this is reflected in the physical properties of the pebble. right off the water is forced to bend just about the pebble, just as the clod essential bend around the feet of the cattle. This is a picture of the worlds harshness and cruelty, and we cannot help but appreciate that it is the pebbles assessment of love that more accurately reflects it.To conclude, mayhap the poem is as much about idea lism and realism as it is about love. Love, after all, is subject to our tendency to be both idealistic and realistic. Ultimately though, it seems that the portrait of the world as harsh and brutal confirms a negative view of love as equally harsh and brutal. At the very least, the poem encourages us to be ambivalent of love and not muse it to be a kind of deliveryman capable of transcending all.