Sam Harris Thesis Review

Morality and values depend on the existence of conscious mindsand specifically on the fact that such minds can experience various forms of benefit and suffering in this universe. Conscious minds and their states are natural phenomena, of course, fully limit by the laws of Nature (whatever these turn out to be in the end). Therefore, thither must be right and molest helps to questions of ethical motive and values that potentially fall within the purview of science. On this view, several(prenominal) people and cultures forget be right (to a greater or lesser degree), and some will be wrong, with respect to what they deem important in life. (Harris, 2011) This is surface-to-air missile Harriss thesis in his book The Moral Landscape How acquirement Can Determine Human Values. This proposition purports science can answer questions about morality. Science is about empirical evidence non affable norms or accepted moral standards (morality). His stance on morality is relate on na turalistic fallacy. It is the thought that morality is the result of evolution and sociable conditioning. (Craig 2012) The laws of nature do not see to it right or wrong behavior with relativity to the conscious mind.We as humans do not become much moral as we evolve. As situations around us change our ethical motive change based on whats more beneficial to us. We are selfish to one degree or other we lack complete information about the consequences of our actions and even where we possess such information, our interests and preferences often lead us to ignore it. Harris states. (Harris, 2011) However, his thesis contradicts this statement. I assort with many other critics of Harris regarding his idea of healthful being. He does not plant well being or what justifies it.If well being is a classify of the science of morality what can increase or decrease well being? How can well being be the foundation for morality? I do agree with him that our minds can experience much suffe ring. However, the assess of suffering is not a science. The laws of nature do not determine if our response to unpleasant situations or suffering is right or wrong as he suggests. Philosophers believe morality comes from the soul. Scientist believe morality comes from veritable areas of the brain. There are many tests out to study brain functions.These tests march activities in certain areas of the brain that respond to an emotional stimulus. Although scientist continues to research this issue, no network of nerves has been found to determine the process of moral cognition. (Young & antiophthalmic factor Dungan, 2011) Science does not tell us how to live or develop the differences between right and wrong. Morality is based on a educate of thought. Morality does not appear in any type of science. Our morals change as our culture change. Right and wrong is determined in the court of public opinion.