Friday, March 22, 2019
Margin Call Directed by J.C. Chandor Essays -- film analysis
Margin cover (2011)Margin Call is a 2011 film that seeks to give viewers a deeper perspective of the financial crisis that hit the United States in 2008. The film was create verbally and directed by J.C. Chandor. It s depiction of the happenings on Wall driveway has been described as the closest to the actual happenings during the financial crisis. In this film, the of import characters are faced with a moral challenge and they act fit to their personal world views. Personal financial needs are regorge before the clients needs. The questionable manner in which the characters act put the employees on Wall Street on a cross road. It is a uncorrectable balancing act between protect oneself and protecting others. The decisions made by characters in this film create an opportunity for people to discuss the balancing act between self preservation and killing the dreams of the masses.From the beginning, the film is alter with controversial decisions. First, the hearty that is dep icted in this film decides to lay absent most of the employees in the firm leaving only 20% of the workers. However, the firms managers do not lay clear up the workers personally however hire another firm to do this. Without prior pattern, the mass layoff takes can in a rather insensitive manner with employees expected to reserve immediately. First, the decision by the company to lay off the people without warning is a questionable decision. Though they are offered a severance package, the employees are traumatized by the lay off. Having reported to work just like a normal day, none of the employees expect that they are going to lose their jobs on this particular day. Therefore, it is a surprise when the hired human resource squad comes in and explains to the employees that they no long... ...ce of money at whatever costs. At the terminal of the day, the managers watch as more people are laid off as the crisis continues. In conclusion, I disagree with the decisions made by the principal(prenominal) characters in this film. Their predicament is tough to say the least, but it does not vindicate the decisions they make. They choose to follow a route with the full knowledge of the problems it lead cause to other people. The decisions made are motivated purely by money and the need to self preserve and protect. The drive behind the change of worthless assets is for the company to remain afloat even when clients suffer losses. It is touch-and-go to make decisions driven by money and selfishness. It leads to guilt as it causes imperishable pain to other people. Therefore, these characters could have chosen the alternative option of protecting their clients as opposed to protecting themselves.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment